Promise Management
 |
For novel ideas about building embedded systems (both hardware and firmware), join the 25,000+ engineers who subscribe to The Embedded Muse, a free biweekly newsletter. The Muse has no hype, no vendor PR. It takes just a few seconds (just enter your email, which is shared with absolutely no one) to subscribe. |
Promise Management
You'll deliver that system you should be working on now
- rather than reading a magazine - late. Almost certainly. Managers fume
while developers regularly employ heroics in futile attempts to bring projects
back on schedule. Despite massive overtime and exhausted engineers, late
projects continue to be the norm. We repeatedly promise to meet schedules! yet
never do.
Nearly all embedded systems ship with defects, some minor,
too many with major flaws that show up only after shipment, resulting in unhappy
or injured customers. We make implicit promises to deliver "perfect" code,
yet that goal, too, remains elusive.
I looked at a system last Spring where management was
shocked to discover the delivered product had less than half the required
features implemented. That's not uncommon; we continue to deliver products
without all of the promised functionality.
I believe part of the problem with late, buggy and
feature-laden firmware stems from our casual attitude to promise-making.
"Yeah, sure, it'll be done next week," when we really know that months of
work remain to get the thing done right.
We either promise the impossible or acquiesce to promises
made on our behalf by management. Both situations are dysfunctional behaviors
that don't lead to our goal of a great product finished on time. Both are a
form of lying, an activity that poisons relationships and engineering teams.
So here are a few rules of promise-making. Neglect them at
your peril!
1. Keep Them
A justice of the peace recently told me she advises
marriage-bound couples to minimize their vows. "Don't promise too much,"
she advised, "marriage is hard; promise just a little - only what's really
important. Then shut up and then keep those commitments." Interesting advice;
over the years I've heard too many sweeping pledges that crumble in the
barrage of real life.
In marriage and in development, never make a promise
that you cannot keep, no matter how much pressure you feel, no matter how
critical the promise may seem to the company or a customer.
Robert Service, in the delightful poem The Cremation of
Sam MGee, wrote "a promise made is a debt unpaid". Good advice for both
artic explorers and embedded developers.
Salesmen love to promise the world. Engineering always
groans at the latest impossible feature that somehow got shoved into the spec to
satisfy a customer's perceived need. These promises morph simple gadgets into
insanely complex devices that can't be made and that probably no one really
wants anyway. If you spend time in the field with one of these snake-oil pushers
it's pretty obvious how this happens. The sales people feel enormous
pressures: from the company president to flog more product, from the bank
account to earn commissions, and from their own gigantic egos that equate sales
success with a sense of personal worth.
Faced with a balking customer they cave to these forces and
swear anything to get a signed contract. Somehow engineering will make it all
fine in the future. That's tomorrow's problem, but today I got the sale!
If you have kids you know how they'll hide a report card
to put off the day of reckoning. Did it myself when young. Like the sales folks,
they turn today's problem into tomorrow's.
We act exactly the same when we make an impossible promise.
Are you figuring on lots of OT, quite a bit of hope, and more than usual luck to
make the delivery on-schedule? Experience shows you'll likely fail, and in the
meantime turn into a stress puppy, alienate your family, and infuriate the boss.
If there's an upside to these impossible promises I
can't find it.
2. Put it in Writing
When you do make a promise, put it in writing. Now.
Immediately. Wait, and you'll forget to jot it down. Someone will come back
weeks in the future holding you to a statement that, by then, you're not sure
if you made or not! or at least not in that way.
Many companies have memo pads with the warning "avoid
verbal orders!" In law and in life a verbal contract - a promise - is just
as binding as one wrapped in a hundred pages of flowery legal prose. When I hear
someone say they can't commit to a date (even for a casual dinner engagement
or help with a charitable project) without checking their calendar and other
commitments, I know I'm dealing with a true professional. Sure, an immediate
"yes" would be nice, but a delayed but thoughtful "yes" likely means
that person will indeed come through.
When the boss asks you over the water cooler for a rough
guess at a schedule, be wary. Don't bind yourself unless you're quite sure
you can meet that commitment. And then write it down. If you're truly just
tossing ideas around, make it clear that until he sees it in a memo it's just
speculation.
The boss/employee relationship is really mixed up in most
companies. Developers have this sense that the boss is some sort of demigod to
be feared and maybe even worshiped. "Yes, massa" seems to be the expected
response to any request from the upper levels.
But it ain't so. Bosses and employees, especially smart
ones like us, should have a dynamic two-way peer relationship. The boss manages
us, and, if we're wise, we manage him (or her). Practice daily boss
management; help him be more successful as he's doing the same for you. There
are a lot of aspects to boss management, but in the context of this discussion
realize that you must train your supervisor to expect certain behaviors from
you.
Through constant and unflagging repetition show your boss
how you handle promises. You make them in writing. Period. When he claims you
committed to X but there's no paperwork to back it up, he's wrong. Period.
Some wags suggest hanging a sign on your desk that says
"if it's not in writing I didn't promise it."
This means you must not slip up - ever. Put every
promise in writing. Show the boss how this practice is good for the both of you:
you never forget a guarantee, and he gets a clear and concrete vision of what
you are doing. There's no uncertainty and no confusion, both enemies of
effective management.
A poll at a recent Embedded Systems Conference suggested
that 46% of embedded people get either no spec or one that's pathetically
devoid of detail. That means we're undertaking huge development efforts with
no clear view of the goal. We're making promises we don't even understand.
Nothing is in writing. Is this rational or even ethical behavior?
3. Give Margins of Error
Add a deviation range to all written promises. How much
error will this undertaking likely experience? Might forces outside your control
alter things?
Bosses expect a date cast in stone. That's not
unreasonable if there's so much padding in the schedule that the only
uncertainty is how to kill all of the extra time. But an aggressive date without
any margin for error cannot be met. 50 years of software engineering has taught
us the folly of such promises. Yet despite this history bosses still expect
firm, fixed dates. Meanwhile we miss more ship dates than we hit.
We must understand that traditional business practices do
mandate such scheduling. A firm fixed price contract requires spending resources
exactly to the plan. A satellite launch date set by planetary geometry can't
be renegotiated. When the date is truly and absolutely fixed then we must have
some other flexibility in the development process to give us the room to
maneuver when (not if) problems arise.
First, there must be a comprehensive and unchanging spec.
Yet we know these are rare. Most modern agile development methods are predicated
on the observation that the spec changes all of the time. We need a more
adaptive strategy than that offered by Big Up Front Design. But if the schedule
is truly fixed aim for as much spec as you can get.
Second, realize that development is a dance, a stochastic
process rather than a smooth cruise to a delivered system. If we can't avoid
time-consuming unexpected problems, be prepared to go to plan B! or C or D.
For example, keep the system so simple there's no fear of slipping. Or be
willing to ship on-time by removing cool but non-mission-critical features. Try
not to short-change project tools or resources. If possible use contractors
working on subsystems in parallel with the main effort. But find and exploit
other options.
Third, when the date is set more by marketing concerns than
cosmology, give promises encapsulated in bounds. "We'll deliver in 5 months
plus 3 minus 1" is a lot more honest than the usual "sure, 5 months,
whatever."
I suspect the next great area in software engineering will
be resolving the disconnect between modern development methods and traditional
management techniques. Spiral development, Evolutionary methods, XP, SCRUM, and
a whole host of approaches all deliver incrementally. Make some subset of the
system work, then iterate, re-evaluating the schedule at each delivery. That
eminently sensible approach recognizes the realities of software and meets the
needs of programmers, but leaves management quite at sea. The bosses have good
reasons for requiring dates. Our methods are woefully inadequate at meeting this
need.
Did you promise zero defects? That's unreasonable, if
only because no one knows how to measure such a standard of perfection. Better:
"passes our entire test suite without problems". That bounds the problem,
eliminating open-ended and impossible promises.
4. Eliminate Assumptions
If you find someone assuming you made a promise,
immediately correct that assumption. Refer them back to your written promises.
Promises are like rumors. They grow with the retelling.
Engineering tells marketing 6 months, marketing suggests to sales 5, and the
customer finally hears 4. Management decides this will be the best desktop OS
ever, sales says it'll be almost defect-free, and the dealers hear about a
Linux-killer that can't be hacked.
A developer wrote that he was fired because the customer
was appalled at the lack of features provided with his company's initial
release of a new product. An early department-wide meeting that included sales
and engineering resulted in slashing those features. Somehow sales forgot to
tell the customer. With neither meeting minutes nor follow-up memos engineering
took the fall and this engineer lost his job. Appalling but true.
A technically-unsavy friend recently bought radar for his
sailboat. He called me over to look at the "malfunctioning" unit. Everything
looked fine to me, till Tom mentioned that the salesman promised that he'd see
ships on the screen. "All I see
are those splotches; I thought there would be pictures of ships", he
complained. The sales guy promised it would show ships, but this customer
assumed something very different.
Be ruthless in destroying unfounded assumptions.
5. Fess Up
Stuff happens; life is tough, there are no guarantees. Do
everything in your power to meet your promises, but when that becomes impossible
admit it early.
When I ran engineering groups the employee behaviors that
were most infuriating were to give me bad news late, and to give bad news
without options.
Things do go wrong, problems surface, and unexpected
difficulties are inevitable in life. Another part of boss management is keeping
him informed of progress and roadblocks. When it's clear disaster lurks, bring
the boss into the picture. Wait too long and you'll all be faced with fewer
recovery choices.
Understand that in most cases your supervisor knows less
than you do about the subject at hand. That doesn't make him a dimwit. Proper
roles are for you to do the work and him to clear a path for you. Don't expect
him to ride to the rescue; it's up to you to look for options. Try to present
both the problem and a range of proposed solutions. "This thing won't run as
fast as we hoped, but if we trim these features, or eliminate wait states, or
add a co-processor, we can recover." Even if none of the solutions are
particularly palatable, discussing them opens the doors for effective
brainstorming.
Presenting disaster unaccompanied by alternatives invites
emotional responses of frustration, anger, and hopelessness.
Conclusion
Promises are the coin of our business; we trade promises of
future product completion for ongoing salary and benefits. Make them lightly and
you will pay a bitter price.
Have you ever been frustrated by a neighbor who doesn't
follow through on promises made about coaching little league or similar
activities? The rule of thumb is to find a busy person when you need something
done. Busy people know how to say "no" when they can't manage a
commitment, and how to insure they meet their promises. It seems to me that busy
people are effective because they've practiced proactive promise-making, and
know how to follow through on those commitments.
. That's a noble ideal for us all to try for.
|